Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Page of 4921
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 98407 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT admitted additional ground regarding exemption under s.10(15)(iv)(h) for interest income from PSU bonds/debentures, following NTPC precedent and Bombay HC ruling in Siva Equipment. Matter remanded to AO for verification of eligibility criteria. On s.80G deduction claim, following previous ITAT ruling for AY 2006-07, issue remanded to AO for fresh examination. Regarding computation u/r 2 of First Schedule (s.44), ITAT affirmed that life insurance business profits must be calculated as annual average surplus between inter-valuation periods per Insurance Act 1938 requirements. Revenue's appeal dismissed on all grounds, maintaining consistency with prior coordinate bench decisions. AO directed to verify factual aspects of exemption claims while adhering to statutory provisions.
ITAT admitted additional ground regarding exemption under s.10(15)(iv)(h) for interest income from PSU bonds/debentures, following NTPC precedent and Bombay HC ruling in Siva Equipment. Matter remanded to AO for verification of eligibility criteria. On s.80G deduction claim, following previous ITAT ruling for AY 2006-07, issue remanded to AO for fresh examination. Regarding computation u/r 2 of First Schedule (s.44), ITAT affirmed that life insurance business profits must be calculated as annual average surplus between inter-valuation periods per Insurance Act 1938 requirements. Revenue's appeal dismissed on all grounds, maintaining consistency with prior coordinate bench decisions. AO directed to verify factual aspects of exemption claims while adhering to statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4921 
