Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
HC directed State Authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim after verifying facts and entitlement. The decision stemmed from respondents' inaction despite repeated requests for GST refund collected during contract execution. Court mandated compliance with Central Government orders dated 28.01.2020 and 06.06.2018, along with subsequent relevant orders. The authorities must render appropriate decision within 90 days from order receipt. The disposition emphasizes administrative efficiency in GST refund processing while ensuring proper verification of entitlements under existing governmental directives.
HC directed State Authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim after verifying facts and entitlement. The decision stemmed from respondents' inaction despite repeated requests for GST refund collected during contract execution. Court mandated compliance with Central Government orders dated 28.01.2020 and 06.06.2018, along with subsequent relevant orders. The authorities must render appropriate decision within 90 days from order receipt. The disposition emphasizes administrative efficiency in GST refund processing while ensuring proper verification of entitlements under existing governmental directives.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
