Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The ITAT held that the assessment for AY 2008-09 initiated u/s 153A was beyond the 10-year limitation period prescribed, rendering the assessment order invalid. However, regarding the addition of share capital and share premium u/s 153A, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s finding of incriminating material, validating the assessment order, relying on the Goldstone Cements Ltd. case. The appeals were partly allowed and partly dismissed.
The ITAT held that the assessment for AY 2008-09 initiated u/s 153A was beyond the 10-year limitation period prescribed, rendering the assessment order invalid. However, regarding the addition of share capital and share premium u/s 153A, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s finding of incriminating material, validating the assessment order, relying on the Goldstone Cements Ltd. case. The appeals were partly allowed and partly dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
