Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The HC set aside the non-speaking order of the respondent and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration of the demand in the show cause notice and the petitioner's reply. The respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reconciliation report which showed excess credit of Rs. 1,40,684/- after adjusting IGST, CGST and SGST, violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's explanation. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC set aside the non-speaking order of the respondent and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration of the demand in the show cause notice and the petitioner's reply. The respondent failed to consider the petitioner's reconciliation report which showed excess credit of Rs. 1,40,684/- after adjusting IGST, CGST and SGST, violating principles of natural justice. The impugned order did not provide reasons for rejecting the petitioner's explanation. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
