Stamp valuation increases after registration-fee payment led to deletion of property-purchase addition within tolerance and without valuation referral...
Capital Asset Conversion Requires Proven Business Stock Treatment; Paper Consideration in Spousal Flat Transfers Does Not Create Taxable Business Inco...
Human-probability test defeats political donation deduction where banking records mask accommodation-entry fund layering and evidence shows non-genuin...
Page of 4886
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 97714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the reopening of assessment beyond four years was without jurisdiction as the reasons did not disclose any material facts that the assessee failed to disclose during the original assessment proceedings. Merely reproducing the proviso's wordings does not satisfy the jurisdictional condition for reopening. The reasons recorded were based on the assessee's case records filed during the assessment, which is impermissible for reopening after four years under the first proviso to Section 147. The HC ruled in favor of the assessee.
The HC held that the reopening of assessment beyond four years was without jurisdiction as the reasons did not disclose any material facts that the assessee failed to disclose during the original assessment proceedings. Merely reproducing the proviso's wordings does not satisfy the jurisdictional condition for reopening. The reasons recorded were based on the assessee's case records filed during the assessment, which is impermissible for reopening after four years under the first proviso to Section 147. The HC ruled in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
