Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
The HC held that the reopening of assessment beyond four years was without jurisdiction as the reasons did not disclose any material facts that the assessee failed to disclose during the original assessment proceedings. Merely reproducing the proviso's wordings does not satisfy the jurisdictional condition for reopening. The reasons recorded were based on the assessee's case records filed during the assessment, which is impermissible for reopening after four years under the first proviso to Section 147. The HC ruled in favor of the assessee.
The HC held that the reopening of assessment beyond four years was without jurisdiction as the reasons did not disclose any material facts that the assessee failed to disclose during the original assessment proceedings. Merely reproducing the proviso's wordings does not satisfy the jurisdictional condition for reopening. The reasons recorded were based on the assessee's case records filed during the assessment, which is impermissible for reopening after four years under the first proviso to Section 147. The HC ruled in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.