Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Appellate enhancement limits protect against new income sources, while documented credits and prior-year investments resist unexplained-income additio...
HC dismissed petition for complete stay of demand. Petitioner directed to pay 20% of Rs. 5.86 crore demand in 6 installments. Additions made by AO on account of non-genuine purchases based on search, statements and investigation. Petitioner failed to rebut findings or prove purchases were genuine. No prima facie case made out for full stay or financial incapacity shown to pay 20% demand.
HC dismissed petition for complete stay of demand. Petitioner directed to pay 20% of Rs. 5.86 crore demand in 6 installments. Additions made by AO on account of non-genuine purchases based on search, statements and investigation. Petitioner failed to rebut findings or prove purchases were genuine. No prima facie case made out for full stay or financial incapacity shown to pay 20% demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
