Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IA for development of infrastructure facilities. It held that merely entering into an agreement with the government or receiving payments from it does not disentitle the assessee from claiming deduction as a "developer" u/s 80IA(4). The assessee's activities qualified as development of new infrastructure facilities, following precedents. The department failed to distinguish the facts from favorable orders of higher authorities for prior years.
ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IA for development of infrastructure facilities. It held that merely entering into an agreement with the government or receiving payments from it does not disentitle the assessee from claiming deduction as a "developer" u/s 80IA(4). The assessee's activities qualified as development of new infrastructure facilities, following precedents. The department failed to distinguish the facts from favorable orders of higher authorities for prior years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
