Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 97750 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that it lacks power to condone delay in filing appeals beyond 120 days stipulated u/s 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Section 74(1) proviso expressly excludes applicability of Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 by conferring power to condone delay only up to 60 days beyond initial 60 days period. The applications seeking condonation of delay beyond 120 days were dismissed.
The HC held that it lacks power to condone delay in filing appeals beyond 120 days stipulated u/s 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Section 74(1) proviso expressly excludes applicability of Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 by conferring power to condone delay only up to 60 days beyond initial 60 days period. The applications seeking condonation of delay beyond 120 days were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
