Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Petitioners accused of offences u/ss 276C(1) r.w.s. 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for evading capital gains tax by showing only part sale consideration in sale deed while remaining amount paid in cash. HC declined to exercise inherent powers u/s 482 CrPC to quash complaint, holding allegations disclose cognizable offences. Power to quash FIR/complaint an exception, not ordinary rule, to be exercised in rarest of rare cases when allegations do not constitute cognizable offence.
Petitioners accused of offences u/ss 276C(1) r.w.s. 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for evading capital gains tax by showing only part sale consideration in sale deed while remaining amount paid in cash. HC declined to exercise inherent powers u/s 482 CrPC to quash complaint, holding allegations disclose cognizable offences. Power to quash FIR/complaint an exception, not ordinary rule, to be exercised in rarest of rare cases when allegations do not constitute cognizable offence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.