Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The appellants, as individual co-owners of a jointly owned immovable property, are eligible for service tax exemption individually on rent received from leasing the property. They are entitled to separate threshold exemptions under Notification No. 6/2005-S.T. dated 1-3-2005 and cannot be considered an association of persons for combined service tax recovery. The CESTAT held that co-owners receiving rent individually are eligible for separate threshold exemptions. The appeal was allowed.
The appellants, as individual co-owners of a jointly owned immovable property, are eligible for service tax exemption individually on rent received from leasing the property. They are entitled to separate threshold exemptions under Notification No. 6/2005-S.T. dated 1-3-2005 and cannot be considered an association of persons for combined service tax recovery. The CESTAT held that co-owners receiving rent individually are eligible for separate threshold exemptions. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
