Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The appellant is eligible for refund of unutilized CENVAT credit amounting to Rs.2,67,659/- u/s 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 54 and Section 49(6), notwithstanding the time limitation u/s 11B(1) for filing refund claim. Denial of such transitional credit would violate Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution as it is a vested right and property. The CESTAT allowed the appeal directing the Department to process the refund, holding that there is no unjust enrichment as the amount pertains to credit.
The appellant is eligible for refund of unutilized CENVAT credit amounting to Rs.2,67,659/- u/s 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 54 and Section 49(6), notwithstanding the time limitation u/s 11B(1) for filing refund claim. Denial of such transitional credit would violate Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution as it is a vested right and property. The CESTAT allowed the appeal directing the Department to process the refund, holding that there is no unjust enrichment as the amount pertains to credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
