Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The GAAR held that specially designed transformers for WOEG performing dual step-down and step-up functions, supplied by the appellant along with WOEG, cannot be treated as part of WOEG. This is based on CBIC's circular excluding transformers from WOEG parts as per Ministry of New and Renewable Energy's clarification. The appellant's reliance on popular meaning/common parlance principle and Enercon India Ltd's case was rejected as legally untenable. Consequently, such transformers are ineligible for exemption under Sr. No. 234 and 201A of Notification No. 1/2017-CT (Rate). The appeal was dismissed.
The GAAR held that specially designed transformers for WOEG performing dual step-down and step-up functions, supplied by the appellant along with WOEG, cannot be treated as part of WOEG. This is based on CBIC's circular excluding transformers from WOEG parts as per Ministry of New and Renewable Energy's clarification. The appellant's reliance on popular meaning/common parlance principle and Enercon India Ltd's case was rejected as legally untenable. Consequently, such transformers are ineligible for exemption under Sr. No. 234 and 201A of Notification No. 1/2017-CT (Rate). The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.