Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Appellant challenged inclusion of royalty and cost of advertisement incurred in India in assessable value of imported goods u/rs 10(1)(c) and 10(1)(e) of Customs Valuation Rules 2007 involving related party transaction. SC concurred with CESTAT's view that appellant's obligation under agreement to be responsible for sales, distribution, and expenditure in consultation with seller does not attract Rule 10(1)(e). Appeal dismissed.
Appellant challenged inclusion of royalty and cost of advertisement incurred in India in assessable value of imported goods u/rs 10(1)(c) and 10(1)(e) of Customs Valuation Rules 2007 involving related party transaction. SC concurred with CESTAT's view that appellant's obligation under agreement to be responsible for sales, distribution, and expenditure in consultation with seller does not attract Rule 10(1)(e). Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
