Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT held that there was a breach of fiduciary duties and conflict of interest by the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) in the appointment of consultants during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of Sequel Buildcon Private Limited. The IRP failed to disclose relevant information regarding credentials and manner of appointment of consultants to the applicant, a key financier. The IRP's non-disclosure of past associations with the consultants violated the Code of Conduct under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. To safeguard the interests of stakeholders, especially homebuyers, the NCLAT directed the immediate removal of the IRP and the consultants appointed by them.
The NCLAT held that there was a breach of fiduciary duties and conflict of interest by the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) in the appointment of consultants during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of Sequel Buildcon Private Limited. The IRP failed to disclose relevant information regarding credentials and manner of appointment of consultants to the applicant, a key financier. The IRP's non-disclosure of past associations with the consultants violated the Code of Conduct under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. To safeguard the interests of stakeholders, especially homebuyers, the NCLAT directed the immediate removal of the IRP and the consultants appointed by them.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
