Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The HC stayed the impugned order invoking Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 for recovery of short paid tax due to discrepancy between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, holding that Section 73 allows recovery of tax not paid or short paid due to reasons other than fraud or willful misstatement, and the conclusions referring to Section 9 of CGST Act show liability created with reference to IGST and cess leviable.
The HC stayed the impugned order invoking Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 for recovery of short paid tax due to discrepancy between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, holding that Section 73 allows recovery of tax not paid or short paid due to reasons other than fraud or willful misstatement, and the conclusions referring to Section 9 of CGST Act show liability created with reference to IGST and cess leviable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.