Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The Delhi HC in PCIT vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi HUF held that interest, whether on compensation or enhanced compensation received on acquisition of land u/ss 28 or 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be taxable as 'Income from Other Sources' u/s 56(2)(viii), distinguishing the SC's decision in CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF and concurring with the P&H HC's ruling in Mahender Pal Narang vs. CBDT on the amended provisions of Section 56(2).
The Delhi HC in PCIT vs. Inderjit Singh Sodhi HUF held that interest, whether on compensation or enhanced compensation received on acquisition of land u/ss 28 or 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be taxable as 'Income from Other Sources' u/s 56(2)(viii), distinguishing the SC's decision in CIT vs. Ghanshyam HUF and concurring with the P&H HC's ruling in Mahender Pal Narang vs. CBDT on the amended provisions of Section 56(2).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
