Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
The ITAT upheld the deletion of addition u/s 68 regarding the genuineness, creditworthiness, and transactions of loan creditors, relying on the orders of Ambe Tradecorp (P.) Ltd. [2022 (7) TMI 902 - Gujarat HC] and Sandip Kumar Gupta [2024 (7) TMI 1574 - ITAT Kolkata]. The loan amount was duly repaid during the assessment year, and the assessee was not the beneficial owner. The assessee provided evidence acknowledged by the CIT(A), ruling out contraventions of Section 68 regarding identity, creditworthiness, and banking channel transactions. The ITAT also upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on interest on the alleged unsecured loan, following the same principle laid down in the cited orders. The appeal was decided against the revenue.
The ITAT upheld the deletion of addition u/s 68 regarding the genuineness, creditworthiness, and transactions of loan creditors, relying on the orders of Ambe Tradecorp (P.) Ltd. [2022 (7) TMI 902 - Gujarat HC] and Sandip Kumar Gupta [2024 (7) TMI 1574 - ITAT Kolkata]. The loan amount was duly repaid during the assessment year, and the assessee was not the beneficial owner. The assessee provided evidence acknowledged by the CIT(A), ruling out contraventions of Section 68 regarding identity, creditworthiness, and banking channel transactions. The ITAT also upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on interest on the alleged unsecured loan, following the same principle laid down in the cited orders. The appeal was decided against the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.