Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The CESTAT upheld the respondents' case, ruling that the allegations of fraudulently obtaining Duty Free Credit Entitlement (DFCE) licenses and engaging in circular trading of cut and polished diamonds were unfounded. The Tribunal affirmed that the DFCE licenses used for imports were valid, as the DGFT had not cancelled or modified them. Consequently, the demands for duty, confiscation of goods, and penalties were dismissed, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
The CESTAT upheld the respondents' case, ruling that the allegations of fraudulently obtaining Duty Free Credit Entitlement (DFCE) licenses and engaging in circular trading of cut and polished diamonds were unfounded. The Tribunal affirmed that the DFCE licenses used for imports were valid, as the DGFT had not cancelled or modified them. Consequently, the demands for duty, confiscation of goods, and penalties were dismissed, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
