Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that once the source of cash is taxed, it cannot be further taxed as unexplained cash expenditure in the hands of the assessee company. The assessee had furnished details regarding the source of cash expenditures which were accepted by the Interim Board for Settlement. The addition made u/s 69C for cash payments treated as unexplained expenditure by the Assessing Officer was deleted, as it would amount to double taxation, since the cash income was already offered to tax in the hands of the Director. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
The ITAT held that once the source of cash is taxed, it cannot be further taxed as unexplained cash expenditure in the hands of the assessee company. The assessee had furnished details regarding the source of cash expenditures which were accepted by the Interim Board for Settlement. The addition made u/s 69C for cash payments treated as unexplained expenditure by the Assessing Officer was deleted, as it would amount to double taxation, since the cash income was already offered to tax in the hands of the Director. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
