Inaccurate-particulars penalties fail where transfer-pricing documentation shows good faith and due diligence, and underlying capital-gains additions ...
Transfer-pricing tolerance for software sub-licensing falls within the services range, eliminating the adjustment and requiring TDS-credit verificatio...
Customs Broker due diligence requires prescribed KYC, not detecting misdeclarations discoverable only through physical examination, defeating licence ...
E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the reopening of assessment u/s 148, holding that the reasons furnished did not disclose any fresh tangible material. The AO had sought to reapply the law differently on facts already within his knowledge during the original assessment, which is impermissible. As the assessee was a religious charitable trust, anonymous donations received in hundi were rightly claimed as non-taxable u/s 115BBC(2)(b). The ground regarding non-investment of donations in prescribed modes u/s 11(5) was inconsequential due to a prior HC order staying conversion of precious items/metals. Since no fresh material emerged after the original assessment, reopening lacked jurisdiction and was set aside in favor of the assessee.
The HC quashed the reopening of assessment u/s 148, holding that the reasons furnished did not disclose any fresh tangible material. The AO had sought to reapply the law differently on facts already within his knowledge during the original assessment, which is impermissible. As the assessee was a religious charitable trust, anonymous donations received in hundi were rightly claimed as non-taxable u/s 115BBC(2)(b). The ground regarding non-investment of donations in prescribed modes u/s 11(5) was inconsequential due to a prior HC order staying conversion of precious items/metals. Since no fresh material emerged after the original assessment, reopening lacked jurisdiction and was set aside in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.