Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that once the petitioner has availed an alternate remedy of filing a substantive appeal, if the assessment order and notices u/ss 148A and 148 are contrary to Sections 151A and 151 as interpreted in Hexaware, the Appellate and Revisionary Authorities, being bound by the jurisdictional HC's decisions, must consider such legal position. The petitioner can raise contentions regarding the illegality of the Section 148 notice before these authorities in light of the Hexaware case. The impugned assessment order shall remain stayed till the Appellate or Revisionary Authority decides the proceedings. The petitioner shall pursue proceedings before CIT(A) against the assessment order and Revisionary Authority, raising contentions on the illegality of the Section 148 notice based on the HC's Hexaware decision.
The HC held that once the petitioner has availed an alternate remedy of filing a substantive appeal, if the assessment order and notices u/ss 148A and 148 are contrary to Sections 151A and 151 as interpreted in Hexaware, the Appellate and Revisionary Authorities, being bound by the jurisdictional HC's decisions, must consider such legal position. The petitioner can raise contentions regarding the illegality of the Section 148 notice before these authorities in light of the Hexaware case. The impugned assessment order shall remain stayed till the Appellate or Revisionary Authority decides the proceedings. The petitioner shall pursue proceedings before CIT(A) against the assessment order and Revisionary Authority, raising contentions on the illegality of the Section 148 notice based on the HC's Hexaware decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
