PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order deleting the penalty levied by the AO u/s 271DA for alleged violation of Section 269ST. The ITAT observed that the AO had aggregated different cash sales bills raised at different times by different sales executives, without establishing that the bills were raised for sales to a single person exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs in a day. The ITAT held that Section 269ST prohibits receiving cash of Rs. 2 lakhs or more from a single person in a single day, and the violation is connected with the payer's identity, which the AO failed to conclusively prove. The mere presumption of aggregate cash sales exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs was insufficient to establish a violation.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order deleting the penalty levied by the AO u/s 271DA for alleged violation of Section 269ST. The ITAT observed that the AO had aggregated different cash sales bills raised at different times by different sales executives, without establishing that the bills were raised for sales to a single person exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs in a day. The ITAT held that Section 269ST prohibits receiving cash of Rs. 2 lakhs or more from a single person in a single day, and the violation is connected with the payer's identity, which the AO failed to conclusively prove. The mere presumption of aggregate cash sales exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs was insufficient to establish a violation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
