Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the dismissal of the application for discharge u/s 227 CrPC. The sole material against the appellant was the confession statement of a co-accused, which cannot be treated as admissible evidence against him at the trial stage. When there is no material that could translate into evidence, making the person stand trial would be a miscarriage of justice. The alleged offence was consumption of narcotics under the NDPS Act, but no medical examination was conducted on the appellant, and the complaint witness merely smelt the accused. In the absence of any other incriminating material, the confession of a co-accused alone cannot justify framing charges against the appellant.
The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the dismissal of the application for discharge u/s 227 CrPC. The sole material against the appellant was the confession statement of a co-accused, which cannot be treated as admissible evidence against him at the trial stage. When there is no material that could translate into evidence, making the person stand trial would be a miscarriage of justice. The alleged offence was consumption of narcotics under the NDPS Act, but no medical examination was conducted on the appellant, and the complaint witness merely smelt the accused. In the absence of any other incriminating material, the confession of a co-accused alone cannot justify framing charges against the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
