Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC rejected the bail applications of the accused involved in large-scale GST fraud, money laundering and corruption by registering fictitious firms using misused Aadhaar and PAN cards. The accused were charged with offences u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC. Considering the grave economic offences impacting society, the money trail of crores, the accused's influential position, and the likelihood of tampering with evidence or witnesses, the HC denied bail, upholding the principle that bail is an exception in such cases affecting the economic fabric. The relevant part of the accused's statement leading to the discovery of laptops, mobiles, SIM cards and fake invoices is admissible u/s 27 of the Indian Evidence Act.
The HC rejected the bail applications of the accused involved in large-scale GST fraud, money laundering and corruption by registering fictitious firms using misused Aadhaar and PAN cards. The accused were charged with offences u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC. Considering the grave economic offences impacting society, the money trail of crores, the accused's influential position, and the likelihood of tampering with evidence or witnesses, the HC denied bail, upholding the principle that bail is an exception in such cases affecting the economic fabric. The relevant part of the accused's statement leading to the discovery of laptops, mobiles, SIM cards and fake invoices is admissible u/s 27 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
