Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)'s order deleting the addition made u/s 28(iv) for assets received free of cost from the assessee's associated enterprise (AE). The assets were used by the assessee for providing services to its AE on a cost-plus basis, with depreciation on these assets included in the cost base per the Advance Pricing Agreement. As the assessee received remuneration from its AE after mark-up on this cost base, the ITAT held that no benefit arose to the assessee from using these assets provided by the AE. The ITAT also dismissed the other grounds raised by the revenue regarding reimbursement to seconded employees and the low tax effect, upholding the CIT(A)'s order.
The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)'s order deleting the addition made u/s 28(iv) for assets received free of cost from the assessee's associated enterprise (AE). The assets were used by the assessee for providing services to its AE on a cost-plus basis, with depreciation on these assets included in the cost base per the Advance Pricing Agreement. As the assessee received remuneration from its AE after mark-up on this cost base, the ITAT held that no benefit arose to the assessee from using these assets provided by the AE. The ITAT also dismissed the other grounds raised by the revenue regarding reimbursement to seconded employees and the low tax effect, upholding the CIT(A)'s order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
