Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the export commission paid by the assessee to foreign agents in Korea and Indonesia for sales, marketing, and customer support services rendered outside India cannot be treated as fees for technical services (FTS). Consequently, no disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) is warranted for non-deduction of tax at source. Regarding transfer pricing adjustments for provision of product development and other IT services, the Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to include Isummation Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Sagar Soft (India) Ltd., and Yudiz Solution Pvt. Ltd. as comparables and recompute the arm's length price accordingly. For provision of sales and marketing support services, the Tribunal excluded Majestic Research Services and Solutions Ltd. from the list of comparables, directing the TPO to recompute the arm's length price after excluding this company.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the export commission paid by the assessee to foreign agents in Korea and Indonesia for sales, marketing, and customer support services rendered outside India cannot be treated as fees for technical services (FTS). Consequently, no disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) is warranted for non-deduction of tax at source. Regarding transfer pricing adjustments for provision of product development and other IT services, the Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to include Isummation Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Sagar Soft (India) Ltd., and Yudiz Solution Pvt. Ltd. as comparables and recompute the arm's length price accordingly. For provision of sales and marketing support services, the Tribunal excluded Majestic Research Services and Solutions Ltd. from the list of comparables, directing the TPO to recompute the arm's length price after excluding this company.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
