Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. The Tribunal held that the findings regarding breach of Regulations 10(d) and 10(n) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, were incorrect and lacked factual or legal basis. The charge of failure to discharge duties as a customs broker without delay was also incorrectly construed. Consequently, the revocation of the customs broker's license, forfeiture of security deposit, and imposition of penalty were set aside.
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. The Tribunal held that the findings regarding breach of Regulations 10(d) and 10(n) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, were incorrect and lacked factual or legal basis. The charge of failure to discharge duties as a customs broker without delay was also incorrectly construed. Consequently, the revocation of the customs broker's license, forfeiture of security deposit, and imposition of penalty were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
