PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The ITAT held that the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 54F of the Act should have been granted, even though the residential property was purchased in the name of the assessee's wife who is assessed to tax separately. The Tribunal relied on judicial precedents which established that for Section 54F purposes, the new residential house need not be purchased by the assessee in their own name. Since the assessee purchased the property in their wife's name using sale proceeds without any contribution from her, and she is not an unconnected party, the deduction was allowed. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT held that the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 54F of the Act should have been granted, even though the residential property was purchased in the name of the assessee's wife who is assessed to tax separately. The Tribunal relied on judicial precedents which established that for Section 54F purposes, the new residential house need not be purchased by the assessee in their own name. Since the assessee purchased the property in their wife's name using sale proceeds without any contribution from her, and she is not an unconnected party, the deduction was allowed. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
