Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The petitioner failed to amend the invoice and e-way bill to reflect the actual goods loaded on the vehicle, resulting in discrepancies in GST documentation. The High Court upheld the levy of penalty u/s 129(3) of the TNGST Act, 2017, amounting to 200% of the tax payable, due to the irregularity committed by the petitioner. The petitioner was unable to substantiate their case with records before the respondents. The Writ Petition was dismissed, but the petitioner was granted liberty to file a Statutory Appeal before the Appellate Authority u/s 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017.
The petitioner failed to amend the invoice and e-way bill to reflect the actual goods loaded on the vehicle, resulting in discrepancies in GST documentation. The High Court upheld the levy of penalty u/s 129(3) of the TNGST Act, 2017, amounting to 200% of the tax payable, due to the irregularity committed by the petitioner. The petitioner was unable to substantiate their case with records before the respondents. The Writ Petition was dismissed, but the petitioner was granted liberty to file a Statutory Appeal before the Appellate Authority u/s 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
