Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The respondent's request for conversion of shipping bills from NFEI to EOU/other schemes was made after a period of three months, exceeding the time limit. However, it was held that Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 does not specify any time limit for such conversions. The Tribunal and High Court have allowed conversions even when the request was filed beyond three months, as the time limit prescribed by the Board Circular is not binding, being a non-statutory provision. Since the conversion had no revenue implication and the respondent did not claim any export incentive schemes, the impugned order was upheld, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
The respondent's request for conversion of shipping bills from NFEI to EOU/other schemes was made after a period of three months, exceeding the time limit. However, it was held that Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 does not specify any time limit for such conversions. The Tribunal and High Court have allowed conversions even when the request was filed beyond three months, as the time limit prescribed by the Board Circular is not binding, being a non-statutory provision. Since the conversion had no revenue implication and the respondent did not claim any export incentive schemes, the impugned order was upheld, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
