Service permanent establishment requires non-auxiliary services, while arm's-length distributor remuneration precludes further profit attribution in I...
Make-available condition excludes standard SaaS subscription receipts where customers receive no independently usable technical knowledge after subscr...
Anonymous donation classification fails where charitable trusts maintain undisputed donor identity records and evidence corpus contributions' intended...
The ITAT deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] regarding the adjustment u/s 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act. The issue pertained to the treatment of a guarantee/standby letter of credit issued by Standard Chartered Bank, New Delhi, as an international transaction. The CIT(A) had upheld the AO's action of adopting an average rate of 2.22% based on rates of nine banks for making the adjustment u/s 92CA(3), instead of the suo-moto adjustment made by the assessee based on the actual cost incurred. The ITAT, considering the voluntary adjustment of 0.94% made by the assessee based on the actual amount paid to Standard Chartered Bank for the bank guarantee, and the smallness of the amount involved, deleted the addition made by the AO to put an end to the litigation.
The ITAT deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] regarding the adjustment u/s 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act. The issue pertained to the treatment of a guarantee/standby letter of credit issued by Standard Chartered Bank, New Delhi, as an international transaction. The CIT(A) had upheld the AO's action of adopting an average rate of 2.22% based on rates of nine banks for making the adjustment u/s 92CA(3), instead of the suo-moto adjustment made by the assessee based on the actual cost incurred. The ITAT, considering the voluntary adjustment of 0.94% made by the assessee based on the actual amount paid to Standard Chartered Bank for the bank guarantee, and the smallness of the amount involved, deleted the addition made by the AO to put an end to the litigation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
