Stock-in-trade transfer taxability follows possession and consideration, not later conveyance registration, limiting deemed-value provisions to the ac...
Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
The assessee filed a belated Form No. 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC). The issue was whether the procedural requirement of filing Form No. 67 was directory or mandatory. The Tribunal held that since the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) override Section 90 of the Income Tax Act and are more beneficial to the assessee, and Rule 128(a) does not preclude claiming FTC in case of delay in filing Form No. 67 as FTC is a vested right, there was no justification for not allowing FTC. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow FTC in accordance with the India-Thailand DTAA, as the assessee had filed Form No. 67 as evidence of foreign taxes paid. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The assessee filed a belated Form No. 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC). The issue was whether the procedural requirement of filing Form No. 67 was directory or mandatory. The Tribunal held that since the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) override Section 90 of the Income Tax Act and are more beneficial to the assessee, and Rule 128(a) does not preclude claiming FTC in case of delay in filing Form No. 67 as FTC is a vested right, there was no justification for not allowing FTC. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow FTC in accordance with the India-Thailand DTAA, as the assessee had filed Form No. 67 as evidence of foreign taxes paid. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
