Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
Modified returns after business reorganisation must be assessed within pending proceedings, barring parallel scrutiny and consequential transfer prici...
Turnover mismatches under percentage-completion accounting cannot alone establish suppressed income where customer advances remain recorded as liabili...
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed against the Assessment Order, as the petitioner had already availed the statutory remedy of filing an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], which is presently pending. The Court held that the petitioner cannot approach the Court to evade payment of the statutory deposit required while preferring the appeal. The petitioner was granted liberty to file necessary applications before the CIT(A), raising all grounds to assail the Assessment Order. The CIT(A) was directed to hear and dispose of the pending appeal as per the provisions of law.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed against the Assessment Order, as the petitioner had already availed the statutory remedy of filing an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], which is presently pending. The Court held that the petitioner cannot approach the Court to evade payment of the statutory deposit required while preferring the appeal. The petitioner was granted liberty to file necessary applications before the CIT(A), raising all grounds to assail the Assessment Order. The CIT(A) was directed to hear and dispose of the pending appeal as per the provisions of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
