Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Appellate enhancement limits protect against new income sources, while documented credits and prior-year investments resist unexplained-income additio...
The High Court upheld the validity of reassessment u/s 153C and rejected the contention of reopening assessment u/s 147. The Assessing Officer relied on the material seized during the search for making additions in the assessees' hands. The Court affirmed the estimation of income on bogus purchases by the Tribunal at 6%, as it concurred with the reasoned decision of the fact-finding authorities. Consistent with similar cases involving accommodation entries, the 6% addition on estimated purchases maintained.
The High Court upheld the validity of reassessment u/s 153C and rejected the contention of reopening assessment u/s 147. The Assessing Officer relied on the material seized during the search for making additions in the assessees' hands. The Court affirmed the estimation of income on bogus purchases by the Tribunal at 6%, as it concurred with the reasoned decision of the fact-finding authorities. Consistent with similar cases involving accommodation entries, the 6% addition on estimated purchases maintained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
