Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The High Court upheld the validity of reassessment u/s 153C and rejected the contention of reopening assessment u/s 147. The Assessing Officer relied on the material seized during the search for making additions in the assessees' hands. The Court affirmed the estimation of income on bogus purchases by the Tribunal at 6%, as it concurred with the reasoned decision of the fact-finding authorities. Consistent with similar cases involving accommodation entries, the 6% addition on estimated purchases maintained.
The High Court upheld the validity of reassessment u/s 153C and rejected the contention of reopening assessment u/s 147. The Assessing Officer relied on the material seized during the search for making additions in the assessees' hands. The Court affirmed the estimation of income on bogus purchases by the Tribunal at 6%, as it concurred with the reasoned decision of the fact-finding authorities. Consistent with similar cases involving accommodation entries, the 6% addition on estimated purchases maintained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.