Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The High Court allowed the petition and directed the tax authorities to accept the petitioner's Forms 1 and 2 under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act and issue a fresh Certificate in Form 3 within four weeks, granting waiver of the entire interest amount determined in the assessment orders. The Court held that no distinction has been made between waiver of interest on disputed taxes and interest on tax not in dispute u/s 3 of the Act. The tax authorities had erroneously calculated interest by not granting complete waiver, which was contrary to the provisions of the Act. The petitioner undertook to withdraw pending appeals/rectification applications expeditiously.
The High Court allowed the petition and directed the tax authorities to accept the petitioner's Forms 1 and 2 under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act and issue a fresh Certificate in Form 3 within four weeks, granting waiver of the entire interest amount determined in the assessment orders. The Court held that no distinction has been made between waiver of interest on disputed taxes and interest on tax not in dispute u/s 3 of the Act. The tax authorities had erroneously calculated interest by not granting complete waiver, which was contrary to the provisions of the Act. The petitioner undertook to withdraw pending appeals/rectification applications expeditiously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
