Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling sc...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that an appeal cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of non-filing of return or non-payment of advance tax when the entire addition made by the Assessing Officer is under dispute. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to admit the assessee's appeal and adjudicate it on merits after providing an opportunity to both parties. The Tribunal observed that when the entire addition is disputed, there is no admitted income and consequently no advance tax liability arises on such disputed income. Furthermore, the proviso to Section 249(4)(b) empowers the Commissioner (Appeals) to exempt the assessee from the operation of the clause for good and sufficient reasons recorded in writing.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that an appeal cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of non-filing of return or non-payment of advance tax when the entire addition made by the Assessing Officer is under dispute. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to admit the assessee's appeal and adjudicate it on merits after providing an opportunity to both parties. The Tribunal observed that when the entire addition is disputed, there is no admitted income and consequently no advance tax liability arises on such disputed income. Furthermore, the proviso to Section 249(4)(b) empowers the Commissioner (Appeals) to exempt the assessee from the operation of the clause for good and sufficient reasons recorded in writing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.