Inaccurate-particulars penalties fail where transfer-pricing documentation shows good faith and due diligence, and underlying capital-gains additions ...
Transfer-pricing tolerance for software sub-licensing falls within the services range, eliminating the adjustment and requiring TDS-credit verificatio...
Customs Broker due diligence requires prescribed KYC, not detecting misdeclarations discoverable only through physical examination, defeating licence ...
E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee was not an "assessee in default" for non-deduction of tax deducted at source (TDS) u/s 194A on interest paid on loans from group entities. The payments were in the nature of reimbursement and not liable for TDS deduction. The assessee borrowed funds from banks through its group entities and reimbursed the interest cost to them. Since the group entities were not in the lending business and the assessee enjoyed the credit facility through them, the interest payment was a reimbursement. Consequently, the assessee was under no statutory obligation to deduct TDS u/s 194A, and the interest payable for failure to deduct TDS u/s 201(1A) did not arise.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee was not an "assessee in default" for non-deduction of tax deducted at source (TDS) u/s 194A on interest paid on loans from group entities. The payments were in the nature of reimbursement and not liable for TDS deduction. The assessee borrowed funds from banks through its group entities and reimbursed the interest cost to them. Since the group entities were not in the lending business and the assessee enjoyed the credit facility through them, the interest payment was a reimbursement. Consequently, the assessee was under no statutory obligation to deduct TDS u/s 194A, and the interest payable for failure to deduct TDS u/s 201(1A) did not arise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
