Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that when the assessing officer considered undisclosed income based on seized material, they ought to have also considered undisclosed losses from the same material and allowed set-off. Failing to do so constituted a mistake apparent from record u/s 254(2). The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to allow set-off of undisclosed losses of the immediately preceding year against the undisclosed income for the impugned year, following principles of equity, justice and interpreting seized material as a whole.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that when the assessing officer considered undisclosed income based on seized material, they ought to have also considered undisclosed losses from the same material and allowed set-off. Failing to do so constituted a mistake apparent from record u/s 254(2). The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to allow set-off of undisclosed losses of the immediately preceding year against the undisclosed income for the impugned year, following principles of equity, justice and interpreting seized material as a whole.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
