Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
The issue pertained to the inclusion of demurrage charges in the assessable value for payment of customs duty under the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Orissa High Court in the case of Tata Steel Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others, wherein the High Court held that demurrage charges are not included as part of the cost envisaged by the legislation for determining the assessable value. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that demurrage charges cannot be included in the assessable value for payment of customs duty.
The issue pertained to the inclusion of demurrage charges in the assessable value for payment of customs duty under the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Orissa High Court in the case of Tata Steel Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others, wherein the High Court held that demurrage charges are not included as part of the cost envisaged by the legislation for determining the assessable value. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that demurrage charges cannot be included in the assessable value for payment of customs duty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
