Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The High Court dismissed the challenge to the assessment order regarding wrongful availing of input tax credit. The court found the petitioner's claim of surrendering registration under TNVAT Act and CST Act on 25.12.2014 implausible, as it was a holiday and an acknowledgment would not have been issued on that date. The court directed the respondents to verify from which IP address the transactions were made for filing returns in the petitioner's name during the disputed period, facilitating wrongful availing of input tax credit and passing it to unscrupulous dealers.
The High Court dismissed the challenge to the assessment order regarding wrongful availing of input tax credit. The court found the petitioner's claim of surrendering registration under TNVAT Act and CST Act on 25.12.2014 implausible, as it was a holiday and an acknowledgment would not have been issued on that date. The court directed the respondents to verify from which IP address the transactions were made for filing returns in the petitioner's name during the disputed period, facilitating wrongful availing of input tax credit and passing it to unscrupulous dealers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
