Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by the petitioner against the conviction u/s 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the lower courts convicting the petitioner for furnishing a false statement knowingly or with reason to believe it to be false. The court held that the prosecution had proved the foundational facts, and the petitioner failed to dislodge the presumption of 'culpable mental state' u/s 278E beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no perversity or illegality in the impugned judgments of conviction and sentence, and the revision petition was dismissed.
The High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by the petitioner against the conviction u/s 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the lower courts convicting the petitioner for furnishing a false statement knowingly or with reason to believe it to be false. The court held that the prosecution had proved the foundational facts, and the petitioner failed to dislodge the presumption of 'culpable mental state' u/s 278E beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no perversity or illegality in the impugned judgments of conviction and sentence, and the revision petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
