E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
The Assessing Officer (AO) erred in considering the agreed rent as per the agreement instead of the actual rent received from M/s. Mobivil Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. of Rs. 3,74,879/- and TDS deducted thereon of Rs. 37,492/-. The addition made by the AO on the difference between the actual rent received and agreed rent was unjustified. The assessee raised bills under "office rent" and paid CGST & SGST on the monthly rent received. Therefore, the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) was deleted.
The Assessing Officer (AO) erred in considering the agreed rent as per the agreement instead of the actual rent received from M/s. Mobivil Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. of Rs. 3,74,879/- and TDS deducted thereon of Rs. 37,492/-. The addition made by the AO on the difference between the actual rent received and agreed rent was unjustified. The assessee raised bills under "office rent" and paid CGST & SGST on the monthly rent received. Therefore, the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.