COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Assessing Officer (AO) erred in considering the agreed rent as per the agreement instead of the actual rent received from M/s. Mobivil Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. of Rs. 3,74,879/- and TDS deducted thereon of Rs. 37,492/-. The addition made by the AO on the difference between the actual rent received and agreed rent was unjustified. The assessee raised bills under "office rent" and paid CGST & SGST on the monthly rent received. Therefore, the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) was deleted.
The Assessing Officer (AO) erred in considering the agreed rent as per the agreement instead of the actual rent received from M/s. Mobivil Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. of Rs. 3,74,879/- and TDS deducted thereon of Rs. 37,492/-. The addition made by the AO on the difference between the actual rent received and agreed rent was unjustified. The assessee raised bills under "office rent" and paid CGST & SGST on the monthly rent received. Therefore, the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
