Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
The case pertains to the classification and duty liability assessment of imported 'diagnostic reagents' u/s 17 of the Customs Act, 1962. The denial of benefit under Notification No. 50/2017-Cus and application of Serial No. 453 of Schedule III of IGST Notification No. 01/2017 for integrated tax discharge u/s 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act were affirmed. The appellant's claim for assessment under Tariff Item 3822 0090 was denied, and the lack of a 'speaking order' as per Section 17(5) of the Customs Act was not considered. The appellant acquiesced to the higher duty burden due to the 'proper officer's' absolute power. The misdirection of 'self-assessment' and affirmation of re-assessment without material evidence invalidated it ab initio. The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order, restored the bills of entry before the original authority for disposal u/s 17 of the Customs Act, and allowed the appeals by way of remand.
The case pertains to the classification and duty liability assessment of imported 'diagnostic reagents' u/s 17 of the Customs Act, 1962. The denial of benefit under Notification No. 50/2017-Cus and application of Serial No. 453 of Schedule III of IGST Notification No. 01/2017 for integrated tax discharge u/s 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act were affirmed. The appellant's claim for assessment under Tariff Item 3822 0090 was denied, and the lack of a 'speaking order' as per Section 17(5) of the Customs Act was not considered. The appellant acquiesced to the higher duty burden due to the 'proper officer's' absolute power. The misdirection of 'self-assessment' and affirmation of re-assessment without material evidence invalidated it ab initio. The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order, restored the bills of entry before the original authority for disposal u/s 17 of the Customs Act, and allowed the appeals by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
