Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Deposits made by assessee in Krishi Bank were fixed deposit investments, not trading activity. Loss suffered when bank went into liquidation is capital loss, not business loss u/s 28 or bad debt u/s 36(1)(vii). Assessing Officer and appellate authorities rightly treated loss as capital loss based on evidence. No substantial question of law arises for adjudication u/s 260A as it involves findings of fact which cannot be re-adjudicated in appeal. Substantial question of law answered against assessee in favor of revenue.
Deposits made by assessee in Krishi Bank were fixed deposit investments, not trading activity. Loss suffered when bank went into liquidation is capital loss, not business loss u/s 28 or bad debt u/s 36(1)(vii). Assessing Officer and appellate authorities rightly treated loss as capital loss based on evidence. No substantial question of law arises for adjudication u/s 260A as it involves findings of fact which cannot be re-adjudicated in appeal. Substantial question of law answered against assessee in favor of revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
