Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Interest earned on share capital was treated as income, but the assessee argued that the interest was used for capital expenses as mandated by the Ministry of Ayush and was later converted into Share Capital Contribution of the Central Government. The assessee had made fixed deposits, and the interest earned belonged to the Central Government and was utilized as capital receipt with prior approval. The CIT(A) relied on the assessee showing interest as income from other sources, but the Supreme Court's judgment in Kedarnath Jute Mfg Co. Ltd vs CIT held that book entries are not relevant for computing total income. The CIT(A) also relied on CIT vs Pandian Chemicals Limited's case regarding interest earned on own free deposits, which was not applicable here. Considering the facts and legal principles, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and set aside the impugned orders.
Interest earned on share capital was treated as income, but the assessee argued that the interest was used for capital expenses as mandated by the Ministry of Ayush and was later converted into Share Capital Contribution of the Central Government. The assessee had made fixed deposits, and the interest earned belonged to the Central Government and was utilized as capital receipt with prior approval. The CIT(A) relied on the assessee showing interest as income from other sources, but the Supreme Court's judgment in Kedarnath Jute Mfg Co. Ltd vs CIT held that book entries are not relevant for computing total income. The CIT(A) also relied on CIT vs Pandian Chemicals Limited's case regarding interest earned on own free deposits, which was not applicable here. Considering the facts and legal principles, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and set aside the impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
