Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Locus standi of the appellant to file an appeal against the admission of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the fulfillment of the threshold requirement for filing such an application. The key points are: The appellant, who is neither an allottee of the real estate project nor has any stake in it, lacks the locus standi to challenge the order admitting the Section 7 application. The application was filed by financial creditors in a class, alleging default by the corporate debtor in delivering possession of units within the agreed time. The application fulfilled the threshold requirement of being filed by at least 10% of the allottees, as it was filed by 29 out of 255 allottees. The Appellate Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the appeal.
Locus standi of the appellant to file an appeal against the admission of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the fulfillment of the threshold requirement for filing such an application. The key points are: The appellant, who is neither an allottee of the real estate project nor has any stake in it, lacks the locus standi to challenge the order admitting the Section 7 application. The application was filed by financial creditors in a class, alleging default by the corporate debtor in delivering possession of units within the agreed time. The application fulfilled the threshold requirement of being filed by at least 10% of the allottees, as it was filed by 29 out of 255 allottees. The Appellate Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
