Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Service tax assessment case involving suppression of taxable value by appellant in ST-3 returns. Demand raised along with interest and penalty on appellant and directors. Appellant eligible for 33% abatement on taxable value for construction services with supply of materials under Notification 01/2006. Extended period of limitation invoked incorrectly as appellant filed returns regularly without objections from department earlier. After allowing abatement, tax payable for normal period less than already paid, hence no additional demand sustainable. Consequently, interest and penalties on appellant and directors set aside by CESTAT.
Service tax assessment case involving suppression of taxable value by appellant in ST-3 returns. Demand raised along with interest and penalty on appellant and directors. Appellant eligible for 33% abatement on taxable value for construction services with supply of materials under Notification 01/2006. Extended period of limitation invoked incorrectly as appellant filed returns regularly without objections from department earlier. After allowing abatement, tax payable for normal period less than already paid, hence no additional demand sustainable. Consequently, interest and penalties on appellant and directors set aside by CESTAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
